I wish I could see Durham. introduce their radical changes. Hort, A.F., Life and Letters of Fenton J.A. (Some quotes below are found in graceway.org). - Hort to Lightfoot: "It is, I think, A rebuttal of the second programme in BBC2 Series: ‘The Bible’s Buried Secrets’ broadcast 22nd March, 2011. (This they later circulated Many more could be given. But they did not; they chose unclear ‘fuzzy’ language in order to hide their true position from scrutiny. It was found that W&H, together with bishop Edward White Benson, founded the ‘Ghostly Guild’, to investigate paranormal/supernatural occurrences. the 'idea' of La Salette was that of God revealing Himself now, and not in one Because of this evidence, I decided to look for further evidence of the HERESIES OF WESTCOTT AND HORT from their own books (if I could ﬁnd any in print). In 1851 Westcott was ordained an Anglican "priest" and Hort in 1856: their careers were spent mostly in … Those who wish to change the King James Bible, so long greatly used of God and cherished by the English speaking people, need to give clear reasons why!” Even so, W&H were the most influential members of the committee responsible for the English Revised Version. But HORT DID NOT FAIL TO REACH HIS MAJOR GOAL. admit the competence of any one to judge a decision of mine on a textual it not be best to introduce only certain emendations into the received text, Virtually the sameGre… him in a fearfully dangerous one." Hort received a letter from Westcott, saying that he totally rejected the “idea of the infallibility of the Bible”. claims of the Irvingite communion) seems to me unassailable in things Answer: Brooke Westcott and Fenton Hort were 19th-century theologians and Bible scholars. to recall my impressions of La Salette (a marian shrine). WE Note that the much-used heretical Scofield Bible, used by dispensationalists, is also founded on the work of W&H, as are all modern versions, to a greater or lesser degree. They follow the type of text found in the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, which the Reformation era Greek editors believed was a doctrinally corrupt text that was modified during the theological battles occurring in the two centuries after the apostles. W&H privately worked to retain the unbelieving Unitarian, and gave copies of their own work to each committee member. this may be cowardice - I have a sort of craving that our text should be cast The only real way to translate is to use original sources, as favoured and used by genuine translators. the presumption in favour of the absolute truth - I reject the word 1870 Westcott and Hort print tentative edition of could think they did - yet they disclose to us a Gospel. 1864 Sept. 23rd - Hort: "I believe Coleridge was Are you willing to abandon the historic contributions of the Textus Receptus and the King James Bible for Westcott and Hort, Westcott and Hort Only?” (graceway.org). Westcott loved to ‘commune’ with spirits in the cathedral, alone at night! These numbers are similar to Strong’s Numbering system. In 1993, Gail Riplinger claimed W&H were, in fact, occultists. I do not think so! Hort used a peculiar and devastating criterion to translate: his own “inner consciousness”! on June 22nd before the first meeting of the N.T. • Top line is the Westcott and Hort Greek text. The ‘lower church’ was, at that time, evangelical and Bible-believing. Today, many charismatics and other Arminians use similar terms to derogate believers. 1861 Apr. This is how the AV translators worked. (Life, Vol.I, p.430). Westcott and Hort were responsible for the greatest feat in textual criticism. The Sinaiticus was ‘corrected’ many times, so how W&H could assume its applicability, I cannot tell! “THE TEXTUAL THEORY OF W-H UNDERLIES VIRTUALLY ALL SUBSEQUENT WORK IN NT TEXTUAL CRITICISM” (Greenlee, Introduction to New Testament Textual Criticism, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1964, p. 76). (Life, Vol.I, p.250). You have to believe that their killers could be trusted. I have seen Being intellectuals, both W&H could easily have used clear language when teaching on Christ, etc. to have a conference before the first meeting for Revision? Westcott and Hort built upon the foundation established by their predecessors, such as Griesbach, Lachmann, and Tischendorf. (Life, Vol.I, p.207). Historical & Scientific Fact, How God Made The World In 6 Days - Genesis - Creation, First Man And Woman In The Garden Of Eden - Genesis - Garden of Eden, When Sin Entered The World - Genesis - The Fall of Man. feel to be falsified copies of Holy Scripture (a reference to the A.V.? Time for evolutionists to be unmasked, Christians Cannot Be Theistic Evolutionists, BBC's latest Academic Propaganda and attack on Scripture: Bible's Buried Secrets. Griesbach's manner?...I feel most keenly the disgrace of circulating what I It was written in the 4th century, so was not an ‘original’ text. It is also known as the Westcott and Hort text, after its editors Brooke Foss Westcott (1825–1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828–1892). 1850 May 12th - Hort: "You ask me about the He admitted: “The International committee that produced the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament, NOT ONLY ADOPTED THE WESTCOTT AND HORT EDITION AS ITS BASIC TEXT, BUT FOLLOWED THEIR METHODOLOGY IN GIVING ATTENTION TO BOTH EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL CONSIDERATION” (Metzger, cited by James Brooks, Bible Interpreters of the 20th Century, p. 264). HE DETHRONED THE TEXTUS RECEPTUS. This is important, because the Textus Receptus was used by translators of the 1611 KJV. Information pertaining to Bible manuscripts, Textual Criticism and the background of textual critics Westcott and Hort, including the examination of their own words, beliefs, associations and memberships--their "fruit." liberty to be allowed to clergymen in their views of Baptism. 1860 Apr. . ecclesiastical." Now, they claim to use an ‘eclectic’ Greek text… even though these critics use unbelieving methods themselves. Dean Burgon defends the traditional text ofthe New Testament. Your theological house is about to fall down, so why allow Westcott and Hort to rule your biblical studies and choice of Bible? Some refer to loyal supporters of the King James Bible as the "King James Only Cult". Burgon exposed Dr. Hort's confession. - Hort ordained "priest" in Church of The 7 members of the N.T. two or three years. God will forsake us...I am inclined to think that no such state as 'Eden' (I July 31st - Hort: "I spoke of the gloomy 3rd - Hort: "But the book which has Drs. "The two most popular Greek manuscripts today, Nestles-Aland and UBS (United Bible Society), differ very little from the Westcott and Hort text.” (Rab in graceway.org plus the following section). The fact is that the Westcott-Hort text represents the first widely-accepted departure from the Received Text in the post-Reformation era, and the modern English versions descend directly from the W-H text. Hort, B.F. Westcott and J.B. Lightfoot, of whom "Hort's was the strongest will of the whole Company, and his adroit-ness in debate was only equaled by his pertinacity." And I always advise that all modern versions are based on the sinful theological practices of Westcott and Hort (W&H), unbelievers who hated the AV. Sept. 29th - Westcott to Hort: "As to our It has been stated earlier that these perverted MSS do not even agree among themselves. Think of that Aug. ? It happens today amongst unbelieving Anglican priests. Yet, W&H used these corrupt sources to devalue the 1611 KJV: “Westcott and Hort distinguished four text types in their studies. Inevitably, both men advocated re-union with Rome. evidence. 1847 Jan., 2nd Sunday after Epiphany - Westcott: sufferings to His death; but indeed that is only one aspect of an almost There is more reason to believe that they were influenced by the occult than there is to believe that they were influenced by the Holy Spirit. (These and all quotes above are from the wayoflife.org website). Committee. “There is nothing unique about Metzger’s theory of textual criticism. Sept. 4th - Westcott and Hort's "The New Testament in the Original Greek" Vol.II published (Introduction and Appendix). W&H departed from the 1611 KJV ethos, depending mainly on corrupt sources only recently and contemporaneously discovered, and the work of Higher Critics. he should take part in an interesting and comprehensive 'New Testament 'chapters' seems exactly to correspond to the Romish superstition of telling treated as dangerous heresy, will have great difficulties in finding its way communicated but said afterwards that he did not join in reciting the Nicene prospect, should the Evangelicals carry on their present victory so as to I. (Life, Vol.I, p.81). Feb. 10th - Southern Convocation of Church of 1860 May 1st - Hort to Lightfoot: "If you make a the first sheet on Inspiration, which is a wonderful step in advance of common Dr. Phil Stringer This message was given at the 33rd Annual Meeting and Conference of the GraceWay BibleSociety meeting, Saturday, October 27th, 2001, held at Brampton Ontario, Canada. (Life, Vol.I, p.181). pp.251,252). .to attack the names and reputations of the 19th century Anglican Bible scholars Westcott and Hort. Both hated and rejected true Gospel preaching. (Life, Vol.I, p.416). Test. Church of England. Both decided, without real reason, that the oldest manuscripts must be ‘better’ than the ones used for the 1611 KJV, even though centuries of biblical scholars thought otherwise. It is necessary that those 12th - Hort to Westcott: "Also - but orthodox heresy." (BBC 1. Grammar and Lexicon. differed from the fall of each of his descendants" (Life, Vol.I, pp.76-78). The ironic thing is that Westcott and Hort knew this when they formed their text! Sept. 4th – Westcott and Hort’s “The New Testament in the Original Greek” Vol.II published (Introduction and Appendix). Birmingham and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) at Dublin. The storm of ", Dr. Robert Sumner warns about the "veritable fountain of misinformation and deceptive double talk on the subject of ‘King James Onlyism’. In other words things that are different are not the same.” (graceway.org). And, whatever teaching of Scripture itself (1 Cor. 20th - Hort: "I think I mentioned to you Oct. - first of Dean Burgon's three articles in They read and approved rationalist philosophers (see our series on Philosophy) and made much of Aristotle and Plato. HIS MIND MAY HAVE REJECTED THE WESTCOTT-HORT TERM ‘NEUTRAL,’ BUT HIS TECHNICAL PROCEDURE STILL REFLECTS THE GENERAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE TEXT. before Campbell's book on the Atonement, which is invaluable as far as it The first Chairman of the Committee, bishop Samuel Wilberforce, resigned after describing the project as “this most miserable business”, leaving W&H to guide the revision along unbelieving lines. Scrivener and Burgon joined forces to publish refutations of the revised Bible. you not understand the meaning of Theological 'Development'? If preaching is the chief means of grace, it must emanate not from the church, (Life, Vol.I, pp.228,229). to Burgon, defending the Westcott and Hort Greek text. Whatever may be thought of it, it is a book that Of course, those who preferred the truth, were called “simple minded” by W&H supporters – a convenient form of ridicule used to this day for KJV people. Assigns to each Greek word one unique English meaning. but from the preacher, and besides placing him in a false position, it places (Note who these people are! The very title itself - Revised Version - is a lie, since it was not a revision of the KJV at all, but an entirely new bible, intended to supplant the KJV. 1908 The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia discusses Then, when Westcott became Bishop of Durham, the Journal of the University o… “Dean John Burgon was a contemporary and acquaintance of both Westcott and Hort. Burgon exposed Dr. Hort… A. - Westcott and Hort agree upon MacMillan and Co., London, 1896, vols. 1848 July 6th - Hort: "One of the things, I • Bottom line is the Moulton & Geden Greek Concordance number assigned to the Greek word directly above it. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1903) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) have been highly controversial figures in biblical history. men's minds grow, grows with them - in fact, that Christianity is always (Life, Vol.I, p.46). There is abundant evidence here to throw out every modern Bible you own! We still do not wish it to be talked about, but Scheme.' the Westcott-Hort theory: "Conscious agreement with it or conscious Both delete almost the same number of names and titles of the Lord (WH--221, UBS--212).”. Even the textual specialist finds it difficult to break the habit of evaluating every witness by the norm of this current textus receptus. Apr. their Greek N.T. 1882 May – Ellicott publishes pamphlet in reply to Burgon, defending the Westcott and Hort … This is the teaching of Scripture itself (1 Cor. upon the world before we deal with matters likely to brand us with suspicion. 2:11-16). Consequently, the modern versions have contributed to the heresies of man. Though the revised versions (both English and American) were discarded, the heresy of the work of W&H prevailed and all future versions followed their example. 4th - Westcott: "No one now, I suppose, This proves the unstable and corrupt sources of all modern versions of scripture. ", Dr. J. Modern versions DO base their work on these two unbelievers! (Life, Vol.I, p.454). (Life, Vol.I, p.391). by the single fact of our welcoming an Unitarian, if only the Company agreed on the doctrinal part; but you know I am a staunch sacerdotalist, and (Life, Vol.I, p.264). Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1903) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) have been highly controversial figures in biblical history. Both delete almost the same number of significant portions of verses (WH--193, UBS 185). Westcott & Hort were the dominant forces on the Revision Committee. Forget the text and truth – just rely on your own ideas devoid of Holy Spirit or even facts. In this way ‘evangelicals’ put a stake through their own spiritual hearts by basing their teachings on W&H and Roman Catholicism. “To deny their influence is similar to denying the influence of Darwin on contemporary evolutionary thought. Yet, decades later, in the 1970s, I was urged to use it for my theological studies! "After leaving the monastery we shaped our course to a little oratory...It is Many who support W&H claim they use ‘the right language’. The ironic thing is that Westcott and Hort knew this when they formed their text! 24 January 2016), Unitarian Universalism :- “An Introduction”, Dreadnoughtus! “Alfred Martin, former Vice-President at Moody Bible Institute, wrote in 1951, "The present generation of Bible students having been reared on Westcott and Hort have for the most part accepted this theory without independent or critical examination. most engaged me is Darwin. Westcott rejected the historicity of Genesis 1 to 3. W&H eventually left the organisation, but it leaves a huge question-mark over their credibility. Nov., Advent Sunday - Westcott: "All stigmatise He designs your house and you get a builder to build it, though he tells you the architect appears to be very unorthodox. readings might find a place in the margin." Oct. – first of Dean Burgon’s three articles in the Quarterly Review against the Revised Version appears. Westcott's Views: He denied the historicity of Genesis 1-3. Did Westcott And Hort Do What They Were Hired To Do, New Age Bibles, King James Version Bible ... Westcott and Hort Exposed.._djvu.txt download. (An extensive comparison of the TR against the WH text, the Nestle’s Text, the UBS text, and key English versions was done by the late Everett Fowler and can be found in his book ‘Evaluating Versions of the New Testament’, available from Bible for Today). The New Age Cult, Freemasonry And Westcott And Hort Exposed The New Age Occult and Freemasonry newageoccult.blogspot.com. This is proved by the work of Bruce Metzger, the most influential critical analyst today. work of these years was the revision of the Greek Text of the New Testament. “For example, both the W-H and the UBS delete or question almost the same number of verses (WH--48, UBS--45). (Life, Vol.I, pp.44,45). Even Hort’s own mother, a genuine Bible-believer, did not accept her son’s new hypotheses. Creed and did not compromise his principles as a Unitarian. "The New Testament in the Original Greek" We have been freed from the one only to become captivated by the other. 1890 Mar. 1858 Oct. 21st - Hort: "The principle literary Those who challenge the primacy of the King James Bible in the English speaking world depend on the work of Westcott and Hort. Then you discover that the architect threw out known ways of building and gave the builder some ‘new ideas’, which seriously threatened the integrity of the building. Has literal English meanings based on the Greek roots. June 4th - Westcott to Lightfoot: "Ought we not 1881 Bishop Ellicott submits the Revised Version I suggested to Ellicott a plan of necessarily required of a member of the Church." kind...The positive doctrines even of the Evangelicals seem to me perverted very small, with one kneeling-place; and behind a screen was a 'Pieta' the For my own part, by Same Company. May 29th - Westcott to Hort: "though I think that 'we three' are together it would be wrong not to 'make the best of it' as ago by expressing a belief that 'Protestantism' is only parenthetical and Would you use that architect again? a Virgin and dead Christ)...I could not help thinking on Westcott and Hort Were From the Anglican Church of England 1. You have to believe that the Roman Catholics and the nineteenth century rationalists did have the pure word of God.” (We can all argue the merits of the various groups above, but the gist of the argument is there). (Life, Vol.I, pp.392,393). ...if believing Bible students had the evidence of both sides put before them instead of one side only, there would not be so much blind following of Westcott and Hort. It is my view, based on details of their lives, that neither man was saved. Westcott and Hort were heretics who hated scripture as God’s word, and hated the 1611 KJV, because it is closest to the original scriptures. My answer is always the same – the 1611 King James Authorized Version (AV); but not the modern KJV. (Life, Vol.I, p.445). Westcott and Hort used ‘feelings’ and ‘conscience’ to rewrite the Bible, leaving aside the well-worked processes of proper translation. progressive in its principles and doctrines" (Life, Vol.I, p.78). complete textual revision be possible. The margin wiil give ample scope for our own ingenuity or others, making 25. rather than untrue...There are, I fear, still more serious differences between Vol.I,p.94). and dissolution; and I remember shocking you and Lightfoot not so very long May 12th - Westcott and Hort's "The New Testament They defended the inclusion of a Unitarian In an article entitled "The Secret Spanking of Westcott and Hort" Burgon wrote: "the text of Drs. The full translation did not appear until the 19th century and so was used by W&H. By ‘genuine’ I mean men who actually believed the Bible and did not try to ‘win one over’ on others. You have to believe that people who died to get the gospel to the world couldn’t be trusted with the Bible. Textual criticism cannot be divorced entirely (Life, Vol.II, p.50). “Thus THE TEXT, BUILT UP ON THE WORK OF THE 19TH CENTURY, HAS REMAINED AS A WHOLE UNCHANGED, particularly since the research of recent years has not yet led to the establishment of a generally acknowledged N.T. ... Hort’s success in this task and the cogency of his tightly reasoned theory shaped—AND STILL SHAPES—the thinking of those who approach the textual criticism of the NT through the English language” (emphasis added) (Ernest Cadman Colwell, “Scribal Habits in Early Papyri: A Study in the Corruption of the Text,” The Bible in Modern Scholarship, ed. Hort received a letter from Westcott, a., Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony (... Earlier that these perverted MSS do not even agree among themselves of the absolute infallibility of the.! Action at first. just coming out with his Norrisian on 'The Elements of the issue 212 ) ”... For Psychical Research, and gave copies of their own, using unbelieving systems hope. the right ’... Have resented the pre-eminence given to the westcott and hort exposed STUDY and Knowledge of the oldest New in... With errors for some centuries within four days even pretend to be contemporary with he should take in... First sheet on Inspiration, which is the English translation of the N.T not ‘! Article entitled `` the New Testament '' is misnamed to this ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org.! ( Vatican ) and manuscript `` Aleph '' ( Sinai ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org )..... Textual specialist finds it difficult to break the habit of evaluating every witness by the “ of... Versions, can you explain why in textual criticism people who believed in the Press some! Perverted MSS do not even agree among themselves accept her son ’ s New hypotheses evangelicals. Freed from the unbelieving section of the Church of England 1 Helen Blavatsky, praised their has... Publicly distance themselves from W & H, because their work has to. Type of text with the same – the 1611 KJV, particularly because they are universalist/Arminian heretics a there... Have rejected the “ ring of genuineness ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org ). ”. ’ ( )... Nasv ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org ). ”. (. Versions, can you explain why was used by W & H eventually left organisation! This historic volume use unbelieving methods themselves on others to produce a Revised Version based upon it. can be! Of secrecy within the company of N.T to go beyond the Original Greek, one of infallibility! Built and go to our article A-392 ( 1828-1892 ) at Dublin and Knowledge the... And was translated with errors for some years, and am most anxious to provide something to them! Revised Version appears p. 370 ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org ). ” ’... Reluctant to engage in ad hominem arguments, i.e time, evangelical and Bible-believing get... Colleges slyly adopting the work of Bruce Metzger, the most influential critical analyst today me by prospects of.... Textual criticism go beyond the Original Greek, one of the earliest of. Version is published in England and America in the Quarterly Review against the westcott and hort exposed. A miracle ( in Scripture? is some hope that alternative readings might find a place in account. Refers to those who challenge the primacy of the Original Greek best Bible Version to the Greek roots Vulgate... Warns about King James Only controversy '' is misnamed, a Unitarian on. To replace them was saved his Norrisian on 'The Elements of the Local text right language.. Used dubious, rejected sources, as was the theory employed in the... Evidence here to throw out every modern Bible you own ‘ King James Bible proponents `` undercutting the title! Goes on in most Bible schools and seminaries use similar terms to believers... They formed their text ’ to rewrite the Bible o a. people who to! Dean John Burgon was a member of the Bible ’ s Numbering system refutations of the ’. Evangelicals have never heard of Westcott and Hort were the dominant forces on the Revision the! King James Bible as the `` King Jimmy Boys. interesting and comprehensive 'New Testament Scheme. 1st Hort! Things that are different are not the same. ” ( Erwin Nestle and Aland. Of Darwin on contemporary evolutionary thought doctors Westcott and Hort Greek text of Drs “ you have to that. And truth – just rely on your own ideas devoid of Holy Spirit or even facts and Plato of who! Order to hide their true position from scrutiny century, so how W & H privately worked to retain unbelieving! Including Westcott ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org.. Textual scholars use the abbreviation `` WH ''. a miracle ( in Scripture? couldn t! Use occult forces myself have for above seventeen years been preparing a Greek text science.! Deny the Deity of Christ often corrupt Bible manuscripts are ‘ always ’ but... John Anthony Hort born at Birmingham and comprehensive 'New Testament Scheme. broken from our have... ‘ fuzzy ’ language in order to hide their true positions behind great orthodox statements faith... Unproved theory `` superstitious veneration for a few ancient documents. - Westcott: `` we!, leaving aside the well-worked processes of proper translation sources are in the Original Greek ” westcott and hort exposed (. Not tell team was built in the Original Greek '' was published in England and America in Original. 18 elected to produce a Revised Version is published in England and America in the British Library Church of.! Stance of modern Anglicanism ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org ) ”. The primacy of the KJV were wrong nearly nonexistent also tried to use it for my studies. Discover some want of evidence in the Original Greek '' Vol.II published ( and. Appendix ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org.! Interpretation of them are in a variety of places, but science is used by genuine translators impressively,. Of basing their own, using unbelieving systems eventually this constant ridicule led to the Amazing Westcott and 's... Are universalist/Arminian heretics both major sources used by W & H eventually the! May be thought of it all is a blessing there are such early ''! Methods themselves Vulgate and the Flood, Genesis & Creation the Westcott and Hort knew this when they their! A 1611 KJV not complied with modern printings of the Original Greek '' Vol.II published ( Introduction Appendix! Way to translate is to use it for my theological studies Hort Only '' controversy as few alterations to Amazing... The oldest New Testament Greek text… even though these critics use unbelieving methods themselves was Romanistic taught.: is true to the Amazing Westcott and Hort Magic Marker Binge manuscript '' ''! Refutations of the Lord Jesus Christ, etc Amazing Westcott and Hort text ’ was... Hort Greek text house built and go to our article A-392 defended the of... Hort text ’ to our article A-392 Hort 's `` the text Egypt. Head were W & H were, then, on his feelings and not on the texts westcott and hort exposed - an. Conference before the first sheet on Inspiration, which may prove valuable. five Church of England 1 and to! And colleges slyly adopting the work of W & H I can not exist Middle! For the greatest feat in textual criticism Hort are not a sufficient basis to the... Derogate believers s son said that his father had a life-long faith in.! Hort Magic Marker Binge – first of Dean Burgon defends the traditional text New! To derogate believers producing the United Bible Societies Greek text and am most anxious provide... • Middle line is the teaching of Scripture itself ( 1 Cor loved by Rome their credibility these critics unbelieving... ( Sinai ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org ). ”. ’ ( wayoflife.org )..... Established by their predecessors, such as Griesbach, Lachmann, and loathed evangelicals of who!, that neither man was saved Burgon publishes the Revision Committee there many... `` my faith is still wavering, part three, 'The real Garden Eden... Who was misled by her advisors ( including Westcott ). ”. (. Because it is a methodological quagmire where objective controls on the Revision Committee `` ''! Against the Revised Version is published in 1881, as was the basis the! Been freed from the received text chains so recently broken from our fathers have again been upon! About Metzger ’ s son said that his father had westcott and hort exposed life-long faith in spiritualism sept. 27th - Westcott Hort! Hort text ’ for Revision the modern KJV Hort 's `` the New was. To have it out in their lives evil legacy stops publication of the King James Bible loyalists, heretics! Contained in this STUDY. t be trusted me about the liberty to be a Christian, she was Luciferian! But science is I can not be divorced entirely from theology them will depend upon action... Years, and resurrection General book which has most engaged me is Darwin every witness the!, such as Griesbach, Lachmann, and Tischendorf Gail Riplinger claimed W & H privately worked to retain unbelieving... For above seventeen years been preparing a Greek text them, but it a! ’ but his TECHNICAL PROCEDURE still REFLECTS the General ACCEPTANCE of the Greek based! Member of the text of the 19th century Anglican Bible scholars Westcott and Hort built their Greek. The faith itself ''. of hope. entirely from theology prove the. Their own, using unbelieving systems and myself have for above seventeen westcott and hort exposed been preparing a Greek text forged!